At glance, one would assume that HIV prevalence in Zimbabwe is higher in urban areas compared to rural areas. But once you get to read through these statistics you will realise that there isn't much of a difference. From my research, I have been able to establish the country's prevalence rate according to ones place of residence.
Place of Residence
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
Urban
|
14.34
|
15.28
|
15.11
|
14.9
|
14.64
|
14.25
|
Rural
|
15.41
|
14.19
|
13.95
|
13.72
|
13.45
|
13.06
|
National
|
15.67
|
15.35
|
14.99
|
14.8
|
14.74
|
14.57
|
HIV prevalence is slightly higher in urban areas than in rural areas across all years expect in 2011. Results of the 2010-2011 Zimbabwe Health Demographic Health Survey (ZDHS) show a similar distribution but somewhat higher figures. These values should be quoted with caution because the DHS still remains the most reliable and representative population sample.
This being said, there is need for the equal distribution of ART services and etc regardless of geographical location. The concentration shouldn't be biased towards urban areas. The attention must be fair.
No comments:
Post a Comment